John Rawls has died...

Since I'm new to this whole blogging thing, there's no reason for you to know that I am a bonafido Poli-Sci geek.
As such, I note the passing of a Poli-Sci icon with a twinge of regret...
Social Justice According to Rawls:
1st Principle:"Each individual has a right to the most extensive basic liberty compatible with the same liberty for others."
2nd Principle: Social and economic inequalities are just only to the extent that they serve to promote the well-being of the least advantaged.
John Rawls' philosophies on Justice and Society were ones which I could never really espouse. Rather, they were theories that I wished were supportable. I found myself wondering how Rawls interacted with--and felt about--a reality so very different than the one of which he wrote.

Rawls had a game theory which you are welcome to try now if you like...
You, the individual, are going to get to make up the rules for a society in which you you will then live out your life....Cool, huh? Any rules you want, Baby.
...But there's a catch...(saw that one coming a mile away, didn'tcha?)...You are making these rules from behind The Veil of Ignorance...No, no...Rawls is not calling you ignorant...that's MY job...This Veil precludes you from knowing what position you will hold in this new society...Kinda like being a screenwriter *and* a castmember for Planet of the Apes without knowing if you're to be playing a human or an Ape, capiche?
So, go ahead and make the rule that all comely blonde waifs must obey and serve lonely, socially inept single-oids who live in their parents' basement...Just understand that in the new society you may very well find yourself sporting a thong, schleping Mai-tais and wishing you'd been born a red-head--or never born at all...
Now, Rawls' thing was that he believed that individuals in the Original Position (that's you, behind the Veil...not some Biblical Kamasutra take-off...) would always make rules wherein the least among society would enjoy the greatest protection. A very astute chakmat on Hobbes' ideas and those of Utilitarianism (and many others, but damn people, I ain't writing a book here...go pull my old school papers, or better yet, go read up on your Social Contract Theory--It Rocks).
Back in those Halcyon school-daze when feeling smug, I would string along the Rawls set until I'd maneuvered them into position for my one-line response to Rawlsian principles:
"Vegas, Babe."
See, having been around the block a time or two, it's been my oservation that individuals (yours truly not excepted) are possessed of an alarming degree of "not-me-ism" Whether large scale or small scale, the human race is hardwired to roll them bones, take those chances and damn yer eyes, Baby needs a new pair of shoes...I don't for a minute buy that Huey, Dewey or Louis plunked into the Original Position are going to hesitate for more than a blink before setting up what they perceive to be a weighted deck of rules...Oh there may be funny business "three-wishes" type loophole wriggling...but most folks, most of the time are going to "G.F.I. to coin an eighty-ism...
And this, in the context of Rawls, always made me a little sad...Here he had crafted and envisioned a system for rulesmanship that was FAIR, Dammit...or at least as fair as he thought people could really be...and we, pathetic co-habitors of his society and reality couldn't even rise to that moderate level. I wonder if he watched Survivor ...Perhaps that was what finally did his ailing heart in...
In any case, I sincerely hope that Mr. Rawls has gone onto a better place...In fact, I like to think that at the end of a bright tunnel of light, some spirit guide announced, "You find yourself in the Original Position..." and that Mr. Rawls just smiled...
Recent Comments